Withdraw option

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 51 deletions

diff --git a/english/vote/2019/vote_002.wml b/english/vote/2019/vote_002.wml
index a8722d09cc3..1588d93f986 100644
--- a/english/vote/2019/vote_002.wml
+++ b/english/vote/2019/vote_002.wml
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 <define-tag pagetitle>General Resolution: Init systems and systemd</define-tag>
-<define-tag status>P</define-tag>
+<define-tag status>D</define-tag>
 # meanings of the <status> tag:
 # P: proposed
 # D: discussed
@@ -155,56 +155,6 @@ figure out which changes it makes sense to fold into Debian and which
 changes remain purely in the derivative.
 </p>
 
-    <vproposerc />
-    <p>Sam Hartman [<email hartmans@debian.org>]
-	[<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2019/11/msg00117.html'>text of proposal</a>]
-	[<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2019/11/msg00293.html'>amendment</a>]
-    </p>
-    <vsecondsc />
-	This amendment has been submitted by the current Project Leader, and thus does not require seconding
-    <ol>
-        <li>Ansgar Burchardt [<email ansgar@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2019/11/msg00253.html'>mail</a>] </li>
-    </ol>
-    <vtextc />
-	<h3>Choice 3: Focus on systemd for init system and other facilities</h3>
-
-<p>Using its power under Constitution section 4.1 (5), the project issues
-the following statement describing our current position on Init
-systems, multiple init systems, and the use of systemd facilities.  This
-statement describes the position of the project at the time it is
-adopted.  That position may evolve as time passes without the need to
-resort to future general resolutions.  The GR process remains
-available if the project needs a decision and cannot come to a
-consensus.
-</p>
-
-<p>The Debian project recognizes that systemd service units are the
-preferred configuration for describing how to start a daemon/service.
-Packages should include service units or init scripts to start daemons
-and services.  Unless the project or relevant parties have agreed
-otherwise, systemd facilities, where they exist and are stable and
-supported by the systemd maintainers, should be preferred over
-Debian-specific ways of solving the same problem unless the Debian
-approach has clear and obvious advantages.
-</p>
-
-<p>Providing support for multiple init systems or for alternatives to
-other interfaces provided by systemd is not a project priority at this
-time.
-</p>
-
-<p>Debian is committed to working with derivatives that make different
-choices about init systems.  As with all our interactions with
-downstreams, the relevant maintainers will work with the downstreams to
-figure out which changes it makes sense to fold into Debian and which
-changes remain purely in the derivative.
-</p>
-
-<p>Packages may include support for alternate init systems besides
-systemd.  Maintainers use their normal procedures for deciding which
-patches to include.
-</p>
-
     <vproposerd />
     <p>Ian Jackson [<email iwj@debian.org>]
 	[<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2019/11/msg00163.html'>text of proposal</a>]