diff options
| author | Luciano Bello <luciano@debian.org> | 2014-02-02 21:45:51 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Luciano Bello <luciano@debian.org> | 2014-02-02 21:45:51 +0000 |
| commit | 85cbcafbedecb8ef2bdd890b9cf1be2c007b3775 (patch) | |
| tree | 01e9f7dffd6f85a27e42f5efc932c7030a4325e4 /doc/narrative_introduction | |
| parent | 286ca06f8231323d58046d8451623dc76d3c688a (diff) | |
narrative_introduction in MarkDown style
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/secure-testing@25488 e39458fd-73e7-0310-bf30-c45bca0a0e42
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/narrative_introduction')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/narrative_introduction | 484 |
1 files changed, 241 insertions, 243 deletions
diff --git a/doc/narrative_introduction b/doc/narrative_introduction index 0f84e4742f..4f15b7dc92 100644 --- a/doc/narrative_introduction +++ b/doc/narrative_introduction @@ -1,13 +1,12 @@ - A Narrative Introduction to the Debian Security Tracker - +# A Narrative Introduction to the Debian Security Tracker # About ----- -Everything in the Debian Security Tracker is publicly available, as in -"Debian doesn't hide problems" available. +Everything in the [Debian Security Tracker](https://security-tracker.debian.org/) is publicly available, as in +"[Debian doesn't hide problems](https://www.debian.org/social_contract)" available. -The best thing about our tracking 'system' is that it is very basic. +The best thing about our tracking *system* is that it is very basic. There is no horrible overhead of web-based ticket/issue trackers, its just a subversion repository and some text files that we collaboratively edit and then some scripts to parse these files and @@ -22,45 +21,40 @@ This following will give you a basic walk-through of how the files are structured and how we do our work tracking issues. The best way to understand is to check out our repository from -subversion so you have the files on your computer and can follow along +Subversion so you have the files on your computer and can follow along at home. To do this you just need to do the following: -svn co svn+ssh://<alioth user name>@svn.debian.org/svn/secure-testing + svn co svn+ssh://<alioth user name>@svn.debian.org/svn/secure-testing This will check out the working repository (given that you already have -an alioth account and public key authentication already set up, see -http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH). After successfully downloading, -you will have a new directory called secure-testing. Inside this directory -are a number of subdirectories. The data directory is where we do most of -our work. Note that the name of the Subversion repository is historical; +an [Alioth](https://alioth.debian.org/account/register.php) account and [public key authentication already set up](http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH). After successfully downloading, +you will have a new directory called `secure-testing`. Inside this directory +are a number of subdirectories. The `data` directory is where we do most of +our work. + +Note that the name of the Subversion repository is historical; the tracker is not specially related to testing-security, but for Debian security at large. -If you don't have an Alioth account, you can create one at: - -https://alioth.debian.org/account/register.php - -You can then join the team by clicking the 'Request to join' link at: - -https://alioth.debian.org/projects/secure-testing +If you don't have an Alioth account, [you can create one](https://alioth.debian.org/account/register.php). You can then join [the team](https://alioth.debian.org/projects/secure-testing) by clicking the [*Request to join* link](https://alioth.debian.org/project/request.php?group_id=30437). If you don't need write access, you can of course check out our files without an Alioth account as well: -svn co svn://anonscm.debian.org/secure-testing + svn co svn://anonscm.debian.org/secure-testing If you are a git fan, you can also use git-svn. Once you have the git-svn package installed, you can clone the subversion repository into your own local git repository with: -git svn clone svn+ssh://<alioth user account>@svn.debian.org/svn/secure-testing + git svn clone svn+ssh://<alioth user account>@svn.debian.org/svn/secure-testing Note that this will take a very long time (expect over two hours) since every commit from the very beginning (over 12,000 at this point) is checked out individually and merged into your git repository. -Subversion and git-svn Crash Course ------------------------------------ +### Subversion and git-svn Crash Course + The following table lists the most common/useful commands for working with the secure-testing repository: @@ -79,111 +73,181 @@ with the secure-testing repository: | | remote secure-testing repo -----------------+-------------------+------------------------------ -Automatic Issue Updates ------------------------ +The CVE list (`CVE/list`) +------------------------ + +### Automatic Issue Updates -Twice a day a cronjob runs that pulls down the latest full CVE lists -from Mitre, this automatically gets checked into data/CVE/list, and -also syncs that file with other lists like data/DSA/list and -data/DTSA/list. +Twice a day a cronjob runs that pulls down the latest full [CVE](glossary.html#CVE) lists +from [Mitre](glossary.html#mitre), this automatically gets checked into `data/CVE/list`, and +also syncs that file with other lists like `data/DSA/list` and +`data/DTSA/list`. -We get notified via either email -(http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-commits) -of every SVN commit -or via the KGB bot on #debian-security on OFTC. For example, the bot +These and every SVN commit is notified via either the [secure-testing-commits mailing list](http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-commits) +or via the [KGB bot](http://packages.debian.org/sid/kgb-bot) on #debian-security on [OFTC](http://irc.oftc.net/). For example, the bot will say in the channel: -17:14 < KGB-0> joeyh r21191 data/CVE/list * automatic update + 17:14 < KGB-0> joeyh r21191 data/CVE/list * automatic update Most of our work is taking the new issues that Mitre releases and processing them so that the tracking data is correct. Read on for how we do this. -Processing TODO entries ------------------------ +### Processing `TODO` entries The Mitre update typically manifests in new CVE entries. So what we do -is to update our svn repository and then edit data/CVE/list and look -for new TODO entries. These will often be in blocks of 10-50 or so, +is to update our svn repository and then edit `data/CVE/list` and look +for new `TODO` entries. These will often be in blocks of 10-50 or so, depending on how many new issues they have assigned. -IMPORTANT: make sure to read: -http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/2009-May/002394.html +Processing `TODO` entries means check if the problem affects Debian and +to which packages, as well as, evaluate their severity. This information +is based on *research* and not just in the CVE description in order to +to prevent integrating false-positives or incorrect data in the security +tracker. For example, if the CVE id says that something is +vulnerable prior to version X you need to check if that is +the case as well as for the information given on +distro-specific issues. Always make sure you understand the +issue and are able to verify the information is correct. -Issues NOT-FOR-US (NFU) ------------------------ +So, a proper research should include reading the code, finding +fixes/commits in the upstream repository or even write +patches yourself if you have the time to do that. If you +can't assure that please add a `TODO` entry reflecting what is +missing from your research. Check the section [`NOTE` and `TODO` +entries](#NoteTodo) for more details. + +If you are aware of an error in some CVE description, please +write to [oss-security mailing-list](glossary.html#oss-sec) cc-ing team@security.d.o. + +### Issues `NOT-FOR-US` (NFU) Processing entries is done by first seeing if the issue is related to any software packaged in Debian. If it isn't a package in Debian and has no -ITP then you note that in the file with a 'NOT-FOR-US:' tag. Third-party +[ITP/RFP](https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l2) then you note that in the file with a `NOT-FOR-US:` tag. Third-party modules not yet packaged for Debian are also tagged as NFU; even if their parent software is packaged for Debian. The module names should be mentioned in the NFU note in order to make issues apparent if that module -should ever receive a propper package. Another case are meta packages +should ever receive a proper package. Another case are meta packages that only provide a downloader (e.g. flashplugin-nonfree). There is no way to mark such packages as we have no influence on the version and technically the code is not present in Debian. Example: -CVE-2005-3018 (Apple Safari allows remote attackers to cause a denial of -service ...) - NOT-FOR-US: Safari - -Before marking a package NOT-FOR-US, the following should be done: - - Read the full CVE description to determine the product name - - Search for the product using apt-cache search <name> - - If a file was referenced, search for the file using - apt-file search <name> - - Search the wnpp list (http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/) to see - if the product has an ITP or RFP (see "ITP/RFP packages" below) - - Search the ftp-master removal list - (http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals-full.txt) or the Package - Tracking System (http://packages.qa.debian.org/) to see if the - package was present in the past but was removed (see "Removed - packages" below) - -If there is any doubt, add a NOTE with your findings and ask others to -double check. + CVE-2005-3018 (Apple Safari allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service ...) + NOT-FOR-US: Safari + +Before marking a package NFU, the following should be done: + + - Read the full CVE description to determine the product name + - Search for the product using apt-cache search <name> + - If a file was referenced, search for the file using + `apt-file search <name>` + - Search the [WNPP list](http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/) to see + if the product has an ITP or RFP (see [ITP/RFP packages](#ItpRfp) below) + - Search the [ftp-master removal list](http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals-full.txt) + or the [Package + Tracking System](http://packages.qa.debian.org/) to see if the + package was present in the past but was removed (see [Removed + packages](#removed) below) + +If there is any doubt, add a `NOTE` with your findings and/or ask others to +double check using `TODO` (see [`NOTE` and `TODO` entries](#NoteTodo) below) There is a tool that helps with sorting out all the NOT-FOR-US issues: See "bin/check-new-issues -h". For the search functions in check-new-issues to work, you need to have unstable in your -sources.list and have done "apt-get update" and "apt-file update". +sources.list and have done `apt-get update` and `apt-file update`. Having libterm-readline-gnu-perl installed helps, too. If you are not -running unstable, you can search at http://packages.debian.org or -set up an unstable chroot: +running unstable, you can search at [http://packages.debian.org](http://packages.debian.org) or +set up an [unstable chroot](http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch09#_chroot_system). -http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch09#_chroot_system -http://wiki.debian.org/Debootstrap +### Packages in the archive -Undetermined Tags ------------------ +If the vulnerability refers to a package in the Debian archive, look +to see if the package is affected or not (sometimes newer versions that +have the fixes have already been uploaded). + +If the version has been fixed already, note the package name and the +Debian version that fixes it and assign a severity level to it, for +example: + + CVE-2005-2596 (User.php in Gallery, as used in Postnuke, allows users with any Admin ...) + - gallery 1.5-2 (medium) + +Even if the CVE description mentions it is fixed as of a particular +version, double-check the Debian package yourself (because sometimes +the CVE descriptions or information from databases like Secunia is +incorrect). + +If it hasn't been fixed, we determine if there has been a bug filed +about the issue, and if not, file one and then note it in the list +(again with a severity level): + + CVE-2005-3054 (fopen_wrappers.c in PHP 4.4.0, and possibly other versions, does not ...) + - php4 <unfixed> (bug #353585; medium) + - php5 <unfixed> (bug #353585; medium) + +Bug numbers can be added as in the example above. To avoid duplicate bugs, +`bug filed` can be added instead of `bug #123456` when the bug report has +been sent but the bug number is not yet known (however, it is more +desirable to file the bug, wait for the BTS to assign a number, then update +the entry in the CVE list so that complete information is always available +in the tracker). The bug number is important because it makes it clear +that the maintainer has been contacted about the problem, and that they are +aware of their responsibility to work swiftly toward a fix. + +Since CVEs often drop in bulk, submission of multiple CVEs in a single bug +report is permissible and encouraged. However, some maintainers have +indicated a preference for only one issue per bug report. The following +is a list of packages for which each CVE should be reported separately: + + - php5 + - libav + - pwgen + +A special exception is made for kernel related issues. The kernel-sec group +will take care of them. It is not necessary to file bugs in the BTS for kernel +security issues, it only causes overhead. + +If you want to report a bug, bin/report-vuln might be helpful in creating +the bug report. + +If a vulnerability does not affect Debian, e.g. because the vulnerable +code is not contained, it is marked as <not-affected>: + + CVE-2004-2628 (Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in thttpd 2.07 beta 0.4, ...) + - thttpd <not-affected> (Windows-specific vulnerabilities) + +`<not-affected>` is also used if a vulnerability was fixed before a +package was uploaded into the Debian archive. + + +### Undetermined Tags If you don't have time to fully research an issue, but it is abundantly clear (via CVE text or other announcement) that the issue affects a particular package or set of packages, the <undetermined> tag can be used. This has the advantage of entering the issue earlier in the -output of debsecan and on the pts pages, which is useful for the small +output of debsecan and on the PTS pages, which is useful for the small set of proactive maintainers paying attention to these information sources. Getting the maintainer involved hopefully prompts faster fixes. This also allows enables tracking of multiple packages, some of which may already be fixed. -<undetermined> can also be used when there simply is not enough +`<undetermined>` can also be used when there simply is not enough information disclosed in the existing known references about the -issue. Essentially, <undetermined> indicates that someone needs +issue. Essentially, `<undetermined>` indicates that someone needs to come back and revisit the issue. An example undetermined entry is: -CVE-2011-2351 (Use-after-free vulnerability in Google Chrome before 12.0.742.112 ...) + CVE-2011-2351 (Use-after-free vulnerability in Google Chrome before 12.0.742.112 ...) - chromium-browser 12.0.742.112~r90304-1 - webkit <undetermined> NOTE: webkit commit #123456 -The list of all of currently undetermined issues is aggregated at: -http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/undetermined - +The list of all of currently undetermined issues is aggregated [by the tracker](http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/undetermined). This is a good place for new contributors to get started since these are issues that can be pruned quickly for new information that may not have been known during the initial disclosure, and thus marked @@ -192,8 +256,7 @@ add notes if you do change an undetermined issue to unfixed (unless you're also fixing the issue in the process, which is of course the ideal way to help/contribute). -Issues in ITP and/or RFP packages ---------------------------------- +### <a id="ItpRfp">Issues in ITP and/or RFP packages</a> If an issue is discovered in a package that has an RFP or ITP already filed, then that is also noted in order to track the problem, and make sure it is @@ -202,103 +265,37 @@ the <itp> tag. Note this includes both ITPs and RFPs since (from a security tracking standpoint) there is no advantage in tracking them in separate ways. An example entry for an ITP/RFP package is: -CVE-2004-2525 (Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in compat.php -in Serendipity ...) + CVE-2004-2525 (Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in compat.php in Serendipity ...) - serendipity <itp> (bug #312413) -Reserved entries ----------------- +### Reserved entries Several security problems have coordinated dates of public disclosure, i.e. a CVE identifier has been assigned to a problem, but it's not public yet. Also, several vendors have a pool of CVE ids they can assign to problems that are detected in their products. Such entries -are marked as RESERVED in the tracker: +are marked as `RESERVED` in the tracker: -CVE-2005-1432 + CVE-2005-1432 RESERVED -Rejected entries ----------------- +### Rejected entries Sometimes there are CVE assignments that later turn out to be duplicates, -mistakes or non-issues. These items are reverted and turned into REJECTED +mistakes or non-issues. These items are reverted and turned into `REJECTED` entries: -CVE-2005-4129 + CVE-2005-4129 REJECTED -Packages in the archive ------------------------ - -If it is a package in Debian, look to see if the package is affected or -not (sometimes newer versions that have the fixes have already been -uploaded). - -If the version has been fixed already, note the package name and the -Debian version that fixes it and assign a severity level to it, for -example: - -CVE-2005-2596 (User.php in Gallery, as used in Postnuke, allows users -with any Admin ...) - - gallery 1.5-2 (medium) - -Even if the CVE description mentions it is fixed as of a particular -version, double-check the Debian package yourself (because sometimes -the CVE descriptions or information from databases like Secunia is -incorrect). - -If it hasn't been fixed, we determine if there has been a bug filed -about the issue, and if not, file one and then note it in the list -(again with a severity level): - -CVE-2005-3054 (fopen_wrappers.c in PHP 4.4.0, and possibly other -versions, does not ...) - - php4 <unfixed> (bug #353585; medium) - - php5 <unfixed> (bug #353585; medium) - -Bug numbers can be added as in the example above. To avoid duplicate bugs, -"bug filed" can be added instead of "bug #123456" when the bug report has -been sent but the bug number is not yet known (however, it is more -desirable to file the bug, wait for the BTS to assign a number, then update -the entry in the CVE list so that complete information is always available -in the tracker). The bug number is important because it makes it clear -that the maintainer has been contacted about the problem, and that they are -aware of their responsibility to work swiftly toward a fix. - -Since CVEs often drop in bulk, submission of multiple CVEs in a single bug -report is permissable and encouraged. However, some maintainers have -indicated a preference for only one issue per bug report. The following -is a list of packages for which each CVE should be reported separately: - - php5 - - libav - - pwgen - -A special exception is made for kernel related issues. The kernel-sec group -will take care of them. It is not necessary to file bugs in the BTS for kernel -security issues, it only causes overhead. - -If you want to report a bug, bin/report-vuln might be helpful in creating -the bug report. - -If a vulnerability does not affect Debian, e.g. because the vulnerable -code is not contained, it is marked as <not-affected>: - -CVE-2004-2628 (Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in thttpd 2.07 beta 0.4, ...) - - thttpd <not-affected> (Windows-specific vulnerabilities) - -<not-affected> is also used if a vulnerability was fixed before a -package was uploaded into the Debian archive. - -Removed packages ----------------- +### <a id="removed">Removed packages</a> Sometimes there are cases, where a vulnerability hasn't been fixed with a code change, but simply by deciding that a package is that broken that it needs to be removed from the archive entirely. This is tracked with -the <removed> tag: +the `<removed>` tag: -CVE-2005-1435 (Open WebMail (OWM) before 2.51 20050430 allows remote authenticated ...) + CVE-2005-1435 (Open WebMail (OWM) before 2.51 20050430 allows remote authenticated ...) - openwebmail <removed> Also note that it is sufficient to mark a package as removed in unstable. @@ -309,61 +306,16 @@ unstable, then: - libxml <removed> -will track oldstable as affected, but stable and unstable as not-affected. +will track oldstable as affected, but stable and unstable as `not-affected`. Once a package has been completely removed from all currently supported -debian releases, it should be tracked in the data/packages/removed-packages +debian releases, it should be tracked in the `data/packages/removed-packages` file. This file lists all packages (one source package per line) that were at one time in a debian release, but no longer exist in any supported version. Additions to this file can be used to address failing consistency checks after a new release. -Severity levels ---------------- - -These levels are mostly used to prioritize the order in which security -problems are resolved. Anyway, we have a rough overview on how you should -assess these levels. - -unimportant: This problem does not affect the Debian binary package, e.g. - a vulnerable source file, which is not built, a vulnerable file - in doc/foo/examples/, PHP Safe mode bugs, path disclosure (doesn't - matter on Debian). - All "non-issues in practice" fall also into this category, like - issues only "exploitable" if the code in question is setuid root, - exploits which only work if someone already has administrative - privileges or similar. - -low : A security problem, which has only mild security implications - (local DoS, /tmp file races and so on). - -medium : For anything which permits code execution after user interaction. - Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities are in this category as - well, or remote privilege escalation if it's constrained to the - application (i.e. no shell access to the underlying system, such - as simple cross-site scripting). Most remote DoS vulnerabilities - fall into this category, too. - -high : A typical, exploitable security problem, which you'll really - like to fix or at least implement a workaround. This could - be because the vulnerable code is very broadly used, because - an exploit is in the wild or because the attack vector is - very wide. - Should be put into that category anything that permits an attacker - to execute arbitrary code on the vulnerable system (with or - without root privileges) and high-impact denial-of-service bugs - (for instance, an IPv4 forwarding path vulnerability which - requires only very few packets to exploit). - Significant defects in security software can be rated "high" as - well (for instance, a vulnerability in a piece of cryptographic - software which flags forged digital signatures as genuine). - - -Certain packages may get higher or lower rating than usual, based on -their importance. - -end-of-life packages --------------------- +### end-of-life packages In some rare cases (i.e. webprowsers) security support for some packages needed to be stopped before the end of the regular security maintenance @@ -372,33 +324,31 @@ life cycle. Packages which are not anymore supported by the security team in a (old-stable release are marked with the end-of-life tag: -CVE-2011-3973 (cavsdec.c in libavcodec in FFmpeg before 0.7.4 and 0.8.x before 0.8.3 ...) + CVE-2011-3973 (cavsdec.c in libavcodec in FFmpeg before 0.7.4 and 0.8.x before 0.8.3 ...) {DSA-2336-1} - libav 4:0.7.1-7 (bug #641478) - ffmpeg <removed> - ffmpeg-debian <end-of-life> -NOTE and TODO entries ---------------------- +#### <a id="NoteTodo">`NOTE` and `TODO` entries</a> There are many instances where more work has to be done to determine if something is affected, and you might not be able to do this at the time. These entries can have their TODO line changed to something descriptive so that it is clear what remains to be done. For example: -CVE-2005-3990 (Directory traversal vulnerability in FastJar 0.93 -allows remote ...) + CVE-2005-3990 (Directory traversal vulnerability in FastJar 0.93 allows remote ...) TODO: check, whether fastjar from the gcc source packages is affected If you are not sure about some decision (e.g. which package is affected) or -classification (e.g. bug severity) you can leave a TODO note for reviewing, +triaging (e.g. bug severity) you can leave a TODO note for reviewing, explaining which aspect have to be reviewed. For example: -CVE-2013-7295 (Tor before 0.2.4.20, when OpenSSL 1.x is used in ...) - - tor 0.2.4.20-1 (low) - [wheezy] - tor <no-dsa> (Minor issue) - TODO: review, severity. The exploitation scenario is too complicated. + CVE-2013-7295 (Tor before 0.2.4.20, when OpenSSL 1.x is used in ...) + - tor 0.2.4.20-1 (low) + [wheezy] - tor <no-dsa> (Minor issue) + TODO: review, severity. The exploitation scenario is too complicated. It is also useful to add information to issues as you find it, so that when others go to look at an issue and want to know why you marked it @@ -408,36 +358,83 @@ you know that CVE-2005-3258 doesn't affect the squid that we have because the issue was introduced in a patch that was never applied to the Debian package: -CVE-2005-3258 (The rfc1738_do_escape function in ftp.c for Squid 2.5 -STABLE11 and ...) + CVE-2005-3258 (The rfc1738_do_escape function in ftp.c for Squid 2.5 STABLE11 and ...) - squid <not-affected> (bug #334882; medium) NOTE: Bug was introduced in a patch to squid-2.5.STABLE10, NOTE: this patch was never applied to the Debian package. -CVE assignments +Severity levels --------------- -Debian can only assign CVE names from its own pool for issues which -are not public. To request a CVE from the Debian pool, write to -<team@security.debian.org> and include a description which follows CVE -conventions. To request a CVE for public issues, write to Mitre and -possibly to the moderated oss-security list. In the meantime, you can -add an entry of the form +These levels are mostly used to prioritize the order in which security +problems are resolved. Anyway, we have a rough overview on how you should +assess these levels. + +**unimportant**: This problem does not affect the Debian binary package, e.g. + a vulnerable source file, which is not built, a vulnerable file + in `doc/foo/examples/`, PHP Safe mode bugs, path disclosure (doesn't + matter on Debian). + All "non-issues in practice" fall also into this category, like + issues only "exploitable" if the code in question is setuid root, + exploits which only work if someone already has administrative + privileges or similar. + +**low** : A security problem, which has only mild security implications + (local DoS, `/tmp` file races and so on). + +**medium** : For anything which permits code execution after user interaction. + Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities are in this category as + well, or remote privilege escalation if it's constrained to the + application (i.e. no shell access to the underlying system, such + as simple cross-site scripting). Most remote DoS vulnerabilities + fall into this category, too. + +**high** : A typical, exploitable security problem, which you'll really + like to fix or at least implement a workaround. This could + be because the vulnerable code is very broadly used, because + an exploit is in the wild or because the attack vector is + very wide. + Should be put into that category anything that permits an attacker + to execute arbitrary code on the vulnerable system (with or + without root privileges) and high-impact denial-of-service bugs + (for instance, an IPv4 forwarding path vulnerability which + requires only very few packets to exploit). + Significant defects in security software can be rated "high" as + well (for instance, a vulnerability in a piece of cryptographic + software which flags forged digital signatures as genuine). + +Certain packages may get higher or lower rating than usual, based on +their importance. + +### Vulnerabilities without an assigned CVE id + +If you learn of a vulnerability to which has not been assigned a CVE id yet you request one. +To request a CVE for public issues, you can +[write to the moderated oss-security list](http://people.redhat.com/kseifrie/CVE-OpenSource-Request-HOWTO.html#How%20to%20make%20a%20public%20request:). +In the meantime, you can add an entry of the form -CVE-2009-XXXX [optipng array overflow] + CVE-2009-XXXX [optipng array overflow] - optipng 0.6.2.1-1 (low) NOTE: http://secunia.com/advisories/34035/ -in the data/CVE/list file. It is desirable to include references +It is desirable to include references which uniquely identify the issue, such as a permanent link to an entry in the upstream bug tracker, or a bug in the Debian BTS. If the issue is likely present in unstable, a bug should be filed to help the maintainer to track it. Lack of CVE entries should not block advisory publication which are -otherwise ready, but we should strieve to release fully +otherwise ready, but we should strive to release fully cross-referenced advisories nevertheless. +CVE pool from Debian +-------------------- + +Debian can only assign CVE names from its own pool for issues which +are not public. To request a CVE from the Debian pool, write to +<team@security.debian.org> and include a description which follows CVE +conventions. + Distribution tags ----------------- @@ -449,7 +446,7 @@ team and the fact that a source package is part of a release. Distribution tags can be used to denote information about a vulnerability for the version of a package in a specific release. An example: -CVE-2005-3974 (Drupal 4.5.0 through 4.5.5 and 4.6.0 through 4.6.3, when running on ...) + CVE-2005-3974 (Drupal 4.5.0 through 4.5.5 and 4.6.0 through 4.6.3, when running on ...) - drupal 4.5.6-1 (low) [sarge] - drupal <not-affected> (Only vulnerable if running PHP 5) @@ -458,8 +455,8 @@ vulnerable as the vulnerability is only effective when run under PHP 5, which isn't part of Sarge. When a vulnerability is fixed in (oldstable-)proposed-updates, it is added -to next-(oldstable-)point-update.txt and only added to CVE/list after the -point release (during which the no-dsa entry is removed). +to `next-(oldstable-)point-update.txt` and only added to `CVE/list` after the +point release (during which the `no-dsa` entry is removed). Generated Reports ----------------- @@ -468,10 +465,11 @@ All of this tracking information gets automatically parsed and compared against madison to determine what has been fixed and what is still waiting, this results in this website: -http://security-tracker.debian.org/ +[http://security-tracker.debian.org/](http://security-tracker.debian.org/) It incorporates package lists and parses distribution lists and can thus be used to + - Present the security history of a package - Provide overviews of vulnerable packages in stable, testing, sid and oldstable (it still has some false positives, wrt packages in @@ -489,14 +487,15 @@ thus be used to names not found in the packages list, or potentially missing epochs) For every security problem it displays + - The CVE information - A severity assessment by NVD - Cross references to DTSAs, DSAs and bugs in the BTS - The status of a security problem in stable, oldstable, testing and sid - Additional notes from our tracker -The DSA list ------------- +The DSA list (`DSA/list`) +----------------------- We maintain a list of all DSA advisories issued by the stable security team. This information is used to derive information about the state @@ -511,19 +510,19 @@ entry for a DSA looks like this: The first line tracks the date, when a DSA was issued, the DSA identifier, the affected source package and the type of vulnerability. -The second line performs a cross-reference to the entry in CVE/list +The second line performs a cross-reference to the entry in `CVE/list` that maintains the state of the vulnerability in sid. Every entry that -is added like this to DSA/list is parsed by a script and automatically -added to CVE/list. The next lines contain the fixes for stable and +is added like this to `DSA/list` is parsed by a script and automatically +added to `CVE/list`. The next lines contain the fixes for stable and optionally oldstable, addressed with distribution tags. You may add -NOTE: entries freely, we use a NOTE entry for statistical purposes +`NOTE:` entries freely, we use a `NOTE` entry for statistical purposes that tracks, when a fix has reached testing relative to the time when it hit stable. -There is no need to add anything to CVE/list for a DSA, the DSA +There is no need to add anything to `CVE/list` for a DSA, the DSA cross-reference will be added automatically by the cron job. However, -you do need to add [lenny] or [squeeze] entries to CVE/list when there -is a 'no-dsa' or 'not-affected' condition. +you do need to add `[lenny]` or `[squeeze]` entries to `CVE/list` when there +is a `no-dsa` or `not-affected` condition. Checking in your changes ------------------------ @@ -561,8 +560,7 @@ There's an automated tagging of security-related bugs to CVE IDs through the user tag security for the user debian-security@lists.debian.org All bugs added to the tracker are automatically tagged. You can use -the search -http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=security;users=debian-security@lists.debian.org;exclude=tracked +the search [here](http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=security;users=debian-security@lists.debian.org;exclude=tracked) to find all bugs not yet present in the tracker. All bug numbers added to the tracked are automatically associated @@ -573,8 +571,8 @@ If you checked an issue which doesn't need to be added to the tracked remove the security tag from the bugs or send a mail to control@bugs.debian.org with the following content: -user debian-security@lists.debian.org -usertag $BUGNUM + tracked + user debian-security@lists.debian.org + usertag $BUGNUM + tracked IRC Channel ----------- @@ -583,4 +581,4 @@ We hang-out on #debian-security on OFTC, stop by the IRC channel if you'd like, also we can add you to the alioth project so you have svn write permission and you can test drive it on the testing issues for however long you like to get an idea or feel comfortable (and hey it -helps!) +helps!)
\ No newline at end of file |