diff options
| author | Laura Arjona Reina <larjona@debian.org> | 2020-03-24 18:24:56 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Laura Arjona Reina <larjona@debian.org> | 2020-03-24 18:24:56 +0100 |
| commit | de5aec047d6323e66744345ba17fb526f269df07 (patch) | |
| tree | f956e7e70356b728647e8094ef397ea473a44c43 /english | |
| parent | 061a084539609899bd94a9c09e2db6be801c5c47 (diff) | |
Fix typo (Jonathon -> Jonathan)
Diffstat (limited to 'english')
| -rw-r--r-- | english/vote/2020/platforms/bgupta.wml | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/english/vote/2020/platforms/bgupta.wml b/english/vote/2020/platforms/bgupta.wml index 922e84feaac..9faa9381f32 100644 --- a/english/vote/2020/platforms/bgupta.wml +++ b/english/vote/2020/platforms/bgupta.wml @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ I don’t believe we should refuse to use the term Debian Developer anymore beca As a member of the minority of Debian Developers that joined the Project for contributions unrelated to packaging, when I initially joined the project, I had a strong preference for the term Debian Project Member. However, I came to realize my initial reluctance to use Debian Developer was a manifestation of "Imposter Syndrome", and have grown to use the terms interchangeably, depending on the audience I am addressing. Rarely do I use the term non-uploading Debian Developer, but have, when it's needed for clarity. My choice largely depends on what will be the most understood or useful in context. </p> <p> -I was a little dishearted to hear that Jonathon chose to delay his Project Membership to pursue full uploading rights. I don't fault Jonathon for this, as I've seen other people express this preference before, but it seems a sign of a bigger issue, and makes me wonder if today there is a stigma to being a non-uploading Debian Developer, at least by those pursuing membership. +I was a little dishearted to hear that Jonathan chose to delay his Project Membership to pursue full uploading rights. I don't fault Jonathan for this, as I've seen other people express this preference before, but it seems a sign of a bigger issue, and makes me wonder if today there is a stigma to being a non-uploading Debian Developer, at least by those pursuing membership. </p> <p> My ideal long-term future for Debian would be one where the vast majority of Developers only had upload rights to the packages they maintain, as I do not believe that 1000 people all need upload rights to 60,000 packages, and think these rights should be granted very selectively, and only as needed to Developers that have project-wide responsibilities. For example, to active members of Debian Security. |