| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Following up with some discusson from a few months back,
where it was proposed that ProcessTable is a better name.
This data structure is definitely not a list ... if it
was one-dimensional it'd be a set, but in practice it has
much more in common with a two-dimensional table.
The Process table is a familiar operating system concept
for many people too so it resonates a little in that way
as well.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Move host-centric data to new derived <Platform>Machine classes,
separate from process-list-centric data.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First stage in sanitizing the process list structure so that htop
can support other types of lists too (cgroups, filesystems, ...),
in the not-too-distant future.
This introduces struct Machine for system-wide information while
keeping process-list information in ProcessList (now much less).
Next step is to propogate this separation into each platform, to
match these core changes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes the duplication of dynamic meter/column hashtable
pointers that has come in between the Settings and ProcessList
structures - only one copy of these is needed. With the future
planned dynamic screens feature adding another pointer, let us
first clean this up before any further duplication happens.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Nia Alarie <nia@NetBSD.org>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
- TODO, clean up the code base and update comments in code.
|
