diff options
| author | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> | 2020-04-10 09:35:15 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> | 2020-04-10 09:35:15 +0200 |
| commit | 8207f7e92a135e98bf3b08e3efc68518132f249b (patch) | |
| tree | 338b3c48f808e90f7c0c349f728551de8716c5dc | |
| parent | 3293be41e85f41e44a5b337e870ac71250ab2d93 (diff) | |
Add CVE-2020-10707/netty which we probably should drop
The pull request referenced is the same as for CVE-2020-11612 and the
issue correlation seem to be the same. This might be just a duplicate
candidate assignment of CVE-2020-11612 itself thus.
For now track it separately until situation on the CVE is clarified by
either upstream or Red Hat as the assigning CNA for CVE-2020-10707.
| -rw-r--r-- | data/CVE/list.2020 | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/data/CVE/list.2020 b/data/CVE/list.2020 index 9b1526aca1..6cfcd1df0f 100644 --- a/data/CVE/list.2020 +++ b/data/CVE/list.2020 @@ -2066,8 +2066,12 @@ CVE-2020-10709 RESERVED CVE-2020-10708 RESERVED -CVE-2020-10707 +CVE-2020-10707 [compression/decompression codecs don't enforce limits on buffer allocation sizes] RESERVED + - netty 1:4.1.48-1 + NOTE: https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/9924 + NOTE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816216 + TODO: This seem to be a duplicate of CVE-2020-11612, pending request with Red Hat secalert CVE-2020-10706 RESERVED CVE-2020-10705 |