diff options
| author | Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> | 2016-12-28 16:41:40 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> | 2016-12-28 16:41:40 +0000 |
| commit | 71ea5e127199b19e3c7ef1f08009ff56a9361a90 (patch) | |
| tree | 61027cae3acc605ef52ae910bc82917f0c6ee828 /retired/CVE-2015-8967 | |
| parent | 3f4a5dea8e83fbde73e1a88c68e6dccea1c6766a (diff) | |
Fill in status for CVE-2015-8967 and retire it
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel-sec@4811 e094ebfe-e918-0410-adfb-c712417f3574
Diffstat (limited to 'retired/CVE-2015-8967')
| -rw-r--r-- | retired/CVE-2015-8967 | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/retired/CVE-2015-8967 b/retired/CVE-2015-8967 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..80ace3b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/retired/CVE-2015-8967 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +Description: arm64 syscall table is not read-only +References: +Notes: + bwh> This is not a security flaw in itself, but a missing mitigation. + bwh> Additionally, arm64 had no support for page protections in the + bwh> kernel mapping before 4.0, so this is impractical to backport. +Bugs: +upstream: released (4.0-rc1) [c623b33b4e9599c6ac5076f7db7369eb9869aa04] +3.16-upstream-stable: ignored "Missing mitigation, impractical to backport" +3.2-upstream-stable: N/A "Vulnerable architecture not present" +sid: released (4.0.2-1) +3.16-jessie-security: ignored "Missing mitigation, impractical to backport" +3.2-wheezy-security: N/A "Vulnerable architecture not present" |