summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/retired/CVE-2010-4249
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMoritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>2011-11-08 09:10:51 +0000
committerMoritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>2011-11-08 09:10:51 +0000
commit2139ae806ed3c8a5f26253579e4b15447b907e10 (patch)
tree4922ae6d9932b48624cfa494a4266afc382fa68b /retired/CVE-2010-4249
parentf8525c88099df81c721f35e1c4f83f6149bc3f26 (diff)
retire
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel-sec@2541 e094ebfe-e918-0410-adfb-c712417f3574
Diffstat (limited to 'retired/CVE-2010-4249')
-rw-r--r--retired/CVE-2010-424942
1 files changed, 42 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/retired/CVE-2010-4249 b/retired/CVE-2010-4249
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..162465c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/retired/CVE-2010-4249
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+Candidate: CVE-2010-4249
+Description:
+References:
+ http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9915672d41273f5b77f1b3c29b391ffb7732b84b
+ http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/179049/focus=179051
+ http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg147946.html
+ > From Eugene Teo:
+ > Reproducer: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/23/395
+ > Partial fix: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/23/450
+ > Reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656756
+Notes:
+ Note from Neil Horman in the RH bugtracker:
+ Note that9915672d41273f5b77f1b3c29b391ffb7732b84b is only part of the solution.
+ We also need bba14de98753cb6599a2dae0e520714b2153522d from net-next.
+ .
+ jmm> Looks like the following commits are needed from Linus git?
+ jmm> 25888e30319f8896fc656fc68643e6a078263060
+ jmm> 9915672d41273f5b77f1b3c29b391ffb7732b84b
+ jmm> bba14de98753cb6599a2dae0e520714b2153522d (from net-next)
+ dannf> fyi, i have the last two queued up in my tree; it has an
+ dannf> abi change which i need to address properly before commit.
+ dannf> tests show this was sufficient to avoid OOM'ing w/ the reproducer in
+ dannf> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/23/395.
+ dannf> The reproducer associated with 25888e303
+ dannf> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/25/8) is different; and has
+ dannf> different symptoms (unkillable process vs. OOM) - perhaps it should
+ dannf> have a different CVE?
+ dannf>
+ dannf> I've added CVE-2010-af_unix-recursion to track that issue.
+ jmm> 2.6.32.40 is missing bba14, it was added in 2.6.32.47
+Bugs:
+upstream: released (2.6.38) [25888e30319f8896fc656fc68643e6a078263060, 9915672d41273f5b77f1b3c29b391ffb7732b84b, bba14de98753cb6599a2dae0e520714b2153522d]
+2.6.32-upstream-stable: released (2.6.32.47)
+sid: released (2.6.32-30) [bugfix/all/af_unix-limit-unix_tot_inflight.patch, bugfix/all/scm-lower-SCM_MAX_FD.patch]
+2.6.26-lenny-security: released (2.6.26-26lenny2) [bugfix/all/af_unix-limit-unix_tot_inflight.patch, bugfix/all/scm-lower-SCM_MAX_FD.patch]
+2.6.32-squeeze-security: released (2.6.32-30) [bugfix/all/af_unix-limit-unix_tot_inflight.patch, bugfix/all/scm-lower-SCM_MAX_FD.patch, bugfix/all/af_unix-limit-recursion-level.patch]
+
+
+
+
+
+

© 2014-2024 Faster IT GmbH | imprint | privacy policy