diff options
| author | Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org> | 2011-01-12 19:45:55 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org> | 2011-01-12 19:45:55 +0000 |
| commit | 66b8a9fb5af82cdb2d7716a18c121846bde265f1 (patch) | |
| tree | b066947ac6f758e4e704a61cd27433529f692186 /retired/CVE-2010-4161 | |
| parent | 5c884f446e8442183599431ba0b20c364f71d283 (diff) | |
retire issues
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel-sec@2136 e094ebfe-e918-0410-adfb-c712417f3574
Diffstat (limited to 'retired/CVE-2010-4161')
| -rw-r--r-- | retired/CVE-2010-4161 | 18 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/retired/CVE-2010-4161 b/retired/CVE-2010-4161 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f14e3edb --- /dev/null +++ b/retired/CVE-2010-4161 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +Candidate: CVE-2010-4161 +Description: +References: + https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-4161 +Notes: + jmm> The referenced patch ended up in 2.6.26.6, which was + jmm> pulled into the Lenny package. I find the statement in + jmm> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652534#c4 + jmm> a bit confusing, why should RHEL6 have backported + jmm> fda9ef5d, the commit is from 2006? + jmm> Marking 2.6.27 as fixed upstream, since it includes + jmm> 93821778 +Bugs: +upstream: released (2.6.27) +2.6.32-upstream-stable: N/A +linux-2.6: released (2.6.28-1) +2.6.26-lenny-security: N/A "already have rcu protection; reproducer fails" +2.6.32-squeeze-security: N/A |