diff options
| author | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> | 2020-04-10 09:35:15 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> | 2020-04-10 09:35:15 +0200 |
| commit | ff53627b56bf1e544332538bf3333bde0645f1fe (patch) | |
| tree | 40c1c7673c548f863b4a171aae3324a13d7df1cf | |
| parent | af30976008977a8e15fc178f03539427f9e040ce (diff) | |
Add CVE-2020-10707/netty which we probably should drop
The pull request referenced is the same as for CVE-2020-11612 and the
issue correlation seem to be the same. This might be just a duplicate
candidate assignment of CVE-2020-11612 itself thus.
For now track it separately until situation on the CVE is clarified by
either upstream or Red Hat as the assigning CNA for CVE-2020-10707.
| -rw-r--r-- | data/CVE/2020.list | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/data/CVE/2020.list b/data/CVE/2020.list index 9b1526aca1..6cfcd1df0f 100644 --- a/data/CVE/2020.list +++ b/data/CVE/2020.list @@ -2066,8 +2066,12 @@ CVE-2020-10709 RESERVED CVE-2020-10708 RESERVED -CVE-2020-10707 +CVE-2020-10707 [compression/decompression codecs don't enforce limits on buffer allocation sizes] RESERVED + - netty 1:4.1.48-1 + NOTE: https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/9924 + NOTE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816216 + TODO: This seem to be a duplicate of CVE-2020-11612, pending request with Red Hat secalert CVE-2020-10706 RESERVED CVE-2020-10705 |