blob: 80ace3b0654d521906020b9ea7a4ec744e0c09ca (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
Description: arm64 syscall table is not read-only
References:
Notes:
bwh> This is not a security flaw in itself, but a missing mitigation.
bwh> Additionally, arm64 had no support for page protections in the
bwh> kernel mapping before 4.0, so this is impractical to backport.
Bugs:
upstream: released (4.0-rc1) [c623b33b4e9599c6ac5076f7db7369eb9869aa04]
3.16-upstream-stable: ignored "Missing mitigation, impractical to backport"
3.2-upstream-stable: N/A "Vulnerable architecture not present"
sid: released (4.0.2-1)
3.16-jessie-security: ignored "Missing mitigation, impractical to backport"
3.2-wheezy-security: N/A "Vulnerable architecture not present"
|
